Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
ok ok poko kdwkdwExplanation:
A license to form a corporation issued by the state government.
Answer:
internal disclosure controls and procedures.
Explanation:
"Internal disclosure controls and procedures" is a new term created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and it refers to controls and procedures that must be setup by top management of a corporation in order to ensure that the information it discloses under the Securities Exchange Act is properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported.
<span>Human capital is the term that refers to the knowledge, education, training, skills, and expertise of a firm's workers.
</span>Gary Becker, an economist from the University of Chicago has popularized this term. <span> The human capital includes assets of individuals that can be used to create economic value for the individuals, their employers, or their community: </span>
