Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Culture trait is the simplest level of culture. It is an individual tool, act, or belief that is related to a particular situation or need. Using spoons and forks when eating is a culture trait. Another trait is the specific greeting used when meeting people. If you meet a pal, you probably say, “Hello”. On the other hand, when greeting the company's manager you would probably be quite formal. The greeting you use is related to the particular situation or need.
So, Individual culture traits combine to form the next level – culture complexes.
And culture complexes combine to form larger levels called culture patterns. These patterns form important components of a society’s culture.
Answer:
B. market share
Explanation:
Market share is the percentage of consumers that a company has captured from its specific, desired market within an industry.
Answer:
$31,920,341.91
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For computing the receiving amount in 2052 first we have to determine the rate which is shown below:
Current value = Initial value × (1 + interest rate)^time period
$1,480,000 = $115 × (1 + interest rate)^114
So, after solving this, the interest rate is 8.654%
Now the received amount in 2052 is
= $1,480,000 × (1 + 0.8654%)^37
= $31,920,341.91
The time period is come from
= 2015 - 1901
= 114
And, the 37 years is come from
= 2052 - 2015
= 37
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
