1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anygoal [31]
3 years ago
14

Round 9,372,282 to nearest 1000

Mathematics
2 answers:
andreyandreev [35.5K]3 years ago
8 0
9372000 is the answer
Olin [163]3 years ago
8 0
9,372,000 is 9,372,282 rounded to the nearest 1000.

There is something that can help you remember how to round.

Find your place.
Look next door.
5 or greater, add 1 more.
All digits in front, stay the same.
All digits behind, zero is your name.

9,372,282

Find your place. *Since you are rounding to the nearest 1000, the first 2 is the number you will need to look at first— it's in the thousands place.

Look next door. *Look at the number to the right of your starting number. This number is 2. The 2 in the hundreds place is to the right of the 2 in the thousands place.

5 or greater, add 1 more. *2 is not greater than 5. If it was, you would change the 2 in the thousands place to a 3. Instead, just leave both numbers alone.

All digits in front, stay the same. *All numbers in front of the 2 in the thousands place, including the 2 in the thousands place, stay the same.

All digits behind, zero's your name. *All numbers behind the first 2, not including the first 2, change to a zero.
You might be interested in
Julius needs to determine how much information needs to be given about an isosceles triangle to be able to draw an isosceles tri
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

Six cases are enough to construct more than one isosceles triangle

Step-by-step explanation:

An Isosceles triangle is a triangle in which at least two of it's sides are congruent.

If two of the three sides of a triangle are congruent, but the third side is of a different length, the triangle is isosceles.

If all three sides of the triangle are congruent, even though this is an equilateral triangle, it satisfies the condition of an isosceles, and it is ok to still it isosceles.

Julius might decide to split information for a better explanation, it doesn't matter the number of cases he has, but six cases should be enough to draw an isosceles triangle.

3 0
3 years ago
Gemma wants to draw a triangle with side lengths of 4 inches, 12 inches, and 17 inches. Which statement is true? This triangle e
OLga [1]
<span>Answer:This triangle does not exist because the sum of 4 and 12 is less than 17.

Since 4+12 isnt greater than 17, the triangle doesn't exist</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Three fourths as a decimal
sasho [114]
.75. Hope this helps :D
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Listed below are annual data for various years. The data are weights​ (metric tons) of imported lemons and car crash fatality ra
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Because the​ P-value is _(<u>0.02)  less </u> than the significance level 0.05​, there <u> is </u> sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between lemon imports and crash fatality rates for a significance level of α=0.05.

C. The results suggest that imported lemons cause car fatalities.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The study variables are:

X₁: Weight of imported lemons.

X₂: Car crash fatality rate.

The objective is to test if the imported lemons affect the occurrence of car fatalities. To do so you are asked to use a linear correlation test.

I've made a Scatterplot with the given data, it is attached to the answer.

To be able to use the parametric linear correlation you can use the parametric test (Person) or the nonparametric test Spearman. For Person, you need your variables to have a bivariate normal distribution. Since one of the variables is a discrete variable (ratio of car crashes) and the sample is way too small to make an approximation to a normal distribution, the best test to use is Spearman's rank correlation.

This correlation coefficient (rs) takes values from -1 to 1

If rs = -1 this means that there is a negative correlation between the variables

If rs= 1 this means there is a positive correlation between the variables

If rs =0 then there is no correlation between the variables.

The hypothesis is:

H₀: There is no linear association between X₁ and X₂

H₁: There is a linear association between X₁ and X₂

α: 0.05

To calculate the Spearman's correlation coefficient you have to assign ranks to the observed values of each variable, from the smallest to the highest). Then you have to calculate the difference (d)between the ranks and the square of that difference (d²). (see attachment)

The formula for the correlation coefficient is:

rs= 1 - \frac{6* (sum of d^2)}{(n-1)n(n+1)}

rs= 1 - \frac{6* (40)}{4*5*6}

rs= -1

For this value of the correlation coefficient, the p-value is 0.02

Since the p-value (0.02) is less than the significance level (0.05) the decision is to reject the null hypothesis. In other words, there is a linear correlation between the imported lemons and the car crash fatality ration, this means that the modification in the lemon import will affect the car crash fatality ratio.

Note: the correlation coefficient is negative, so you could say that there is a correlation between the variables and this is negative (meaning that when the lemon import increases, the car crash fatality ratio decreases)

I hope it helps!

4 0
3 years ago
Add 2x4 - 6x3 + 5x to the difference between 9x3 + 8x2 - 2 and 4x4 - 2x2 + 8x - 5.
DedPeter [7]

Simplify (x3 +  3x2 + 5x – 4) –  (3x3 – 8x2 – 5x + 6)

The first thing I have to do is take that "minus" sign through the parentheses containing the second polynomial. Some students find it helpful to put a "1" in front of the parentheses, to help them keep track of the minus sign.

Here's what the subtraction looks like, when working horizontally:

(x3 + 3x2 + 5x – 4) – (3x3 – 8x2 – 5x + 6)

(x3 + 3x2 + 5x – 4) – 1(3x3 – 8x2 – 5x + 6)

(x3 + 3x2 + 5x – 4) – 1(3x3) – 1 (–8x2) – 1(–5x) – 1(6)

x3 + 3x2 + 5x – 4 – 3x3 + 8x2 + 5x – 6

x3 – 3x3 + 3x2 + 8x2 + 5x + 5x – 4 – 6

–2x3 + 11x2 + 10x –10

And here's what the subtraction looks like, when going vertically:

x

3

−(3x

3

​

 

+3x

2

−8x

2

​

 

+5x

−5x

​

 

−4

+6)

​

​

In the horizontal addition (above), you may have noticed that running the negative through the parentheses changed the sign on each and every term inside those parentheses. The shortcut when working vertically is to not bother writing in the subtaction sign or the parentheses; instead, write the second polynomial in the second row, and then just flip all the signs in that row, "plus" to "minus" and "minus" to "plus".

\

x

3

–3x

3

−2x

3

​

 

+3x

2

+8x

2

+11x

2

​

 

+5x

+5x

+10x

​

 

−4

–6

−10

​

​

Either way, I get the answer:

–2x3 + 11x2 + 10x – 10

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone help me on number 9 please?
    9·2 answers
  • I don’t know what todo someone help me
    10·1 answer
  • Use rousing or compatible numbers tu estimate the sum 87+34
    14·1 answer
  • What is the answer to 5x-6&gt;x
    6·1 answer
  • Find the price of each product after a discount is applied
    9·1 answer
  • M1 = 156 what is the measure of 8 a.24 b.34 c.156 d 146
    5·1 answer
  • How to convert kilometres to minutes
    5·1 answer
  • If an investment account starts with $3,900, and grows with 2.1% interest, compounded annually, how much is the account worth af
    7·1 answer
  • Analyze the graph below to identify the key features of the logarithmic function.
    6·1 answer
  • 9(9x+2y-6)<br> Please help
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!