Answer:
What do Americans think about preferential hiring of women? Has there been a change in the past decade? In 2000(group 1) and 2010(Group 2), the General Social Survey asked participants if they would favor or oppose preferential hiring of women. In 2000, out of 849 respondents, 271 said yes. In 2010, out of 696 respondents, 225 said yes. The 95% confidence interval for p1-p2 is (-0.0509, 0.04273). What would be an appropriate conclusion? O We are 95% confident that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2000 is 0.04723. We are 95% confident that the pulation proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2010 is 0.04723. We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2000. O We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2010.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
A(t) = 90e^0.12t ;
299 mg
Step-by-step explanation:
General Continous growth rate equation :
A = Pe^rt
A = amount present, t years after year of initial amount.
Here,
P = 90 mg, amount in year 2000
r = rate = 12% = 0.12
t = years after 2000
Therefore,
A is written as ;
A(t) = 90e^0.12t
Amount present in year 2010 ;
t = 2010 - 2000 = 10
A(10) = 90e^0.12(10)
A(10) = 90 * e^1.2
= 90 * 3.3201169
= 298.81052
= 299 mg
Well, there are 3 feet in a yard so you can just divide the number of yards by 3.
Answer:
h=14
Step-by-step explanation:
18h=252
18h/18=252/18
h=14
