Answer: Endotherms
Explanation: Horse and warm-blooded
Answer:
Well, think of how young people are today. Think of yourself even.
To be critical, young people today are quite self-invested, while they want a change in the world, they don't have the motivation to do the work to change. They have many wants, but they simply don't have the motivation or will to do it. Charity is giving to the homeless, helping the needy, or rebuilding or even just feeding someone. Charity can be for so many things. Young people are all about bettering themselves, and not others first. They will not openly give their food to a starving person on the street or give them money to go and buy their own -- they will simply walk on and not glance in their direction. So think basically, charity is giving. And young people today are essentially greedy, right? This is the key thing it wants you to talk about - go into detail.
Answer:
Evidence supports the claim:
- The clock kept saying the time over and over and the house kept preparing food, but no one ate it.
- No one got up to go to work or school.
- The house was the only one standing in the neighborhood, which was among dust and ashes.
Explanation:
The name of the story refers to the poem by Sara Teasdale where the idea that nature will survive humanity is transmitted.
It can be interpreted that what happened to the family of the house was that they were exposed to a nuclear explosion, since their figures marked with fire are seen on the side of the house, the same thing happened in Japan after the atomic bomb of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even the poem was published 5 years after this event.
The poem shows an automated house that continues to operate even though there are no longer any people. Keep cleaning, keep cooking and reporting the time, but no one exists anymore.
In fact, this house was the only one left standing in the desolate neighborhood. Even when the house collapses and is almost destroyed, it still has some basic functions.
Answer:
happy new year buddy! :) ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Explanation:
It is to protect our wild life and to teach us how we can either horribly effect or wonderfully benefit our world. It also failed to mention how it would effect our wild animals, if we take away the trees then we also take away their home, and it is not fair.
