1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
evablogger [386]
3 years ago
14

A candidate’s use of “I” statements in an opening statement is an example of persuasive language. an informal tone. a factual to

ne. rhetorical technique
Social Studies
2 answers:
Bezzdna [24]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer, according to edge, is:

B. an informal tone.

Kruka [31]3 years ago
5 0

A candidate’s use of “I” statements in an opening statement is an example of persuasive language. Persuasive type of  language is used to get the audience to agree with the speaker's views on a particular topic and to convince others to agree with our facts.  Using personal pronouns ( ‘I’, ‘you’ and ‘we’ ) are one example of persuasive techniques.

You might be interested in
Is technology sustainable? Why?
Butoxors [25]

Overall, technology is not the end-all be-all of sustainability, but it is a tool that can be used to effectively create larger amounts of communication and collaboration, and clearer sets of information.

7 0
3 years ago
What is being said in this excerpt?
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

The people of Georgia having dissolved their political connection with the Government of the United States of America, present to their confederates and the world the causes which have led to the separation. For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery. They have endeavored to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to us in reference to that property, and by the use of their power in the Federal Government have striven to deprive us of an equal enjoyment of the common Territories of the Republic. This hostile policy of our confederates has been pursued with every circumstance of aggravation which could arouse the passions and excite the hatred of our people, and has placed the two sections of the Union for many years past in the condition of virtual civil war. Our people, still attached to the Union from habit and national traditions, and averse to change, hoped that time, reason, and argument would bring, if not redress, at least exemption from further insults, injuries, and dangers. Recent events have fully dissipated all such hopes and demonstrated the necessity of separation.

Our Northern confederates, after a full and calm hearing of all the facts, after a fair warning of our purpose not to submit to the rule of the authors of all these wrongs and injuries, have by a large majority committed the Government of the United States into their hands. The people of Georgia, after an equally full and fair and deliberate hearing of the case, have declared with equal firmness that they shall not rule over them. A brief history of the rise, progress, and policy of anti-slavery and the political organization into whose hands the administration of the Federal Government has been committed will fully justify the pronounced verdict of the people of Georgia. The party of Lincoln, called the Republican party, under its present name and organization, is of recent origin. It is admitted to be an anti-slavery party. While it attracts to itself by its creed the scattered advocates of exploded political heresies, of condemned theories in political economy, the advocates of commercial restrictions, of protection, of special privileges, of waste and corruption in the administration of Government, anti-slavery is its mission and its purpose. By anti-slavery it is made a power in the state. The question of slavery was the great difficulty in the way of the formation of the Constitution.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Select THREE facts about the Baker v. Carr Supreme Court case.
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

Baker argued that residents of his district were not receiving equal protection of the laws.

Tennessee argued that legislative redistricting was a political question that needed to be resolved by the legislative branch.

The case changed reapportionment of how people are represented throughout America.

Explanation:

Answered this question and got 100% :)

6 0
3 years ago
James Oglethorpe's decision to recruit Highland Scots to establish a settlement on the Altamaha River is evidence of which of th
Leya [2.2K]

Answer: A or D would be the answer.

6 0
3 years ago
Ana is a 25-year-old unmarried female. if living during the 1700s, ana would
crimeas [40]
She would have been considered as unmarriageable.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about the Supreme Court is true ?
    14·1 answer
  • _______________ the administrative organization that reports directly to the president and made up of important offices, units,
    13·1 answer
  • The ________ conception of human nature claims that we inherit behavioral predispositions from our evolutionary past, but these
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the role of culture in the fundamental attribution error. How prevalent is this error across cultures, and why do these
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Europeans want direct access to Indian spices?
    15·1 answer
  • Questions in image..
    12·1 answer
  • What is the name of Washington's final public statement of political philosophy?
    13·2 answers
  • As a Congressional Representative from Georgia. Tom Watson supported reforms that MOST benefited which group? A civil servants B
    8·1 answer
  • TRUE OR FALSE: Examples of domesticated animals are pigs, sheep, and cattle
    9·2 answers
  • If a person fantasizes about the use of force in sexual relationships, one can conclude that?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!