Answer:
Public goods are better than other goods.
Explanation:
A public good is a product that one person can consume but still it can be available for another person. Another one would not be deprived for the same. This makes public good non-rivalrous. For instance, public park is a public good. If person A is using it, B can also use it at the same time. Services like fire and police are also public goods and are available to all at the same time. Thus, public goods are mostly publicly financed and hence are better.
Private good like a piece of pizza can only be eaten only person 'A' at a given time. Person 'A' can exclude others from eating it unlike a public good.
Answer:
Stop and help
Explanation:
If you let her die it would weigh on you forever.
Answer:
Group polarization.
Explanation:
Group polarization is when inside a group what first was an inclination to some ideas, after the individuals talk, those same ideas become much more stronger and radical. As the exercise exemplifies, the jury is deliberating and their initial attitudes are leaning neutral to slighty toward a guilty verdict. After a few days of deliberation, their ideas have strengthened considerably toward a guilty verdict. That's a good example of group polarization.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>learning </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>Learning perspective</em><em> is described as one of the psychological approaches that generally signifies about the way experience and environment affects an individual's or animal's different actions and it encompasses social-cognitive and behaviorism learning theories.</em>
<em>The learning theory </em><em>was initially started with the work of a psychologist named </em><em>Albert Bandura</em><em> who has proposed the social learning theory.</em>
<em>As per the question, the therapist's suggestion most clearly reflects a learning perspective.</em>
<em> </em>
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Labeling theory of crime and deviance is a form of social theory that concluded that people behave defiantly according to the label at which they were given.
For example, if someone is called a by a popular thug name, such a person would start behaving like that particular thug.
There are criticisms of the labeling theory of crime and deviance, some of which are:
1. It does not clarify the main deviance or the reason people take offense in the first place which arises before they have been labeled
2. It suggests that deviants have no knowledge of their offense until they are labeled, but most know they are disobeying institutional standards
3. It does not clarify the source of labels. For example common practices and traditions system or capitalism principles.
