1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Furkat [3]
3 years ago
13

Parole officers are responsible for monitoring the activities of parolees; offenders recently released from prison. Traditionall

y, only those offenders who acknowledged responsibility for their past criminal behavior and demonstrated an ability to reenter society without re-offending earned the privilege of parole. More recently, however, several state and federal courts have ruled that prison overcrowding constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. In an effort to reduce their populations, several states have begun releasing offenders on parole, often years before their sentence is completed. This practice has not been well received by members of various parole boards who believe the practice of paroling offenders to reduce overcrowding robs the board of the opportunity to evaluate whether an offender is likely to comply with the conditions of his or her parole and avoid re-offending.
In an essay of no less than 300 words, discuss whether the need to reduce prison overcrowding, which has been determined to be cruel and unusual punishment, is more important than the authority of the parole board to offer early release to the most qualified offenders only.
Law
1 answer:
lisabon 2012 [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Parole officers are responsible for monitoring the activities of parolees; offenders recently released from prison. Traditionally, only those offenders who acknowledged responsibility for their past criminal behavior and demonstrated an ability to reenter society without re-offending earned the privilege of parole. More recently, however, several state and federal courts have ruled that prison overcrowding constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. In an effort to reduce their populations, several states have begun releasing offenders on parole, often years before their sentence is completed. This practice has not been well received by members of various parole boards who believe the practice of paroling offenders to reduce overcrowding robs the board of the opportunity to evaluate whether an offender is likely to comply with the conditions of his or her parole and avoid re-offending.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the highest rank in police jobs?
EastWind [94]
D. chief of police :)
3 0
3 years ago
If you needed to raise money on your visits, which three districts would you visit? What information influenced your decision? W
GrogVix [38]

2, 3, 4

the crime rates

unemployment

4 0
2 years ago
What would the capital city of Canada be if the capital city of the USA were the capital of Canada?
nirvana33 [79]

Answer:

Washington state

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How long would this case be eligible for prosecution based on the new california law?
salantis [7]

Explanation:

The range is usually from one year for many misdemeanors, three years for many felonies, to no time limit at all for crimes that are punishable by death or by life in prison. If there is no statute of limitations, the prosecutor may bring charges against someone at any time.

5 0
2 years ago
Should Congress have the power to refuse to vote on a justice nominee? Why or why not?
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.

Explanation:

For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A law which promotes the opportunity for foreign workers to obtain employment, housing, and medical care regardless of their cit
    5·1 answer
  • What must a search warrant include
    9·2 answers
  • ____________ is a statement in the u.S. Constitution granting congress the power to pass all laws necessary and proper for carry
    9·1 answer
  • A ___________ is a subdivision of a company-size unit that normally consists of ___________ or more ___________ and its leader i
    5·1 answer
  • Student Information
    13·1 answer
  • What does it mean when our court system is identified as a dual court system?
    14·2 answers
  • What decides the winner of a presidential election?
    13·2 answers
  • ¿ en que consiste el código electoral ?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the U.S. Supreme Court's ultimate decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube and how does it address the issue of separatio
    11·1 answer
  • Chris comes home from work and finds his wife Megan in bed with another woman, Morgan. Enraged and out of control, Chris, a conc
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!