Answer:
the misinformation effect
Explanation:
The misinformation effect: In psychology, the misinformation effect is also referred to as a false memory.
The misinformation effect is described as the propensity of an individual's post-event memory or information to hinder or interfere with the memory or information of the original event.
The misinformation effect leads to the impairment in the past-event memory of an individual that arises due to the exposure to misleading or false information.
In the question above, the statement signifies the misinformation effect.
Answer:
protected
Explanation:
A class can be declared with modifier public.when the class is visible to all classes everywhere and there is no modifier,it can be visible at its own package.
Answer: Different writers
Explanation:
Mark 6:4 uses lack of honor to describe the same thing that Luke does when he writes that Jesus said no one is accepted in their home country.
They both used different writing styles and neither were first hand witnesses to Jesus' ministry so they relied on what they heard from others. It is therefore logical to assume that the reason the words are different is that these are different writers who described things differently.
When you compare the founding father of the UAE (Sheikh Zayed), and the Father of the Indian Nation, Mahatma Gandhi, you can see that there are many similarities between them. Both Zayed and Gandhi wanted peace in their country and stressed solidarity and union of people in order to achieve it. They were both wise men who understood what was needed for their respective countries to thrive and separate themselves from the countries they once belonged to. Their aim was to spread love, peace, and harmony among people which they succeeded at their time.
Answer:
sociological imagination,
Explanation:
With the term "sociological imagination" first written in 1959, Mills refers to the sociological imagination, as the mindset for sociologists and students of sociology, that enables us to connect individual experiences and social events.
It also enables us to differentiate, measure the social forces of a public character, in an individual, group and public spheres.
It is an effort to identify the impact on private life, put it in context or disassociate it.
The sociological imagination lets us understand the historical process that lay before us, and that targe us in terms of our personal experiences.
Based on the circumstances, we identify private issues, as such. The character of interactions with other people. We set public issues into a whole another arena and make relationships within the social structures.
It is a key ability for anyone engaging in research and study of social science. The ability to gain insight and a correct framework and perspective comes from plentiful suggestions that Wight Mills wrote- :)
