Answer:
Before-tax income $ 11,252,000
Less: Deduction for state income tax(529000+451000) $ 980,000
Taxable Income $ 10,272,500
Tax rate 21%
Federal income tax $ 2,157,225.00
Mesa’s combined tax rate
= ([$980,000 state tax + $2,157,225 federal tax] ÷ $11252000) 27.88%
Explanation:
Answer:
$109,250
Explanation:
FIFO assumes that the units to arrive first, will be sold first. Therefore, inventory valuation is based on later or recent prices.
Step 1 : units in ending inventory
Ending Inventory = units available for sale - units sold
= 9,500
Step 2 : inventory value
Ending Inventory = 9,500 x $11.50 = $109,250
Answer:
Variety-seeking.
Explanation:
Consumers are buying variety-seeking goods when they switch between brands of convenience goods out of boredom or the desire to change. Purchases may have been pre-planned in that consumers "knew" they were going to purchase a specific product or brand but changed their minds in-store, deciding to try something different. Variety-seeking behavior is depicted by the consumers when they have very low involvement with in the buying process and there are significant differences are also present among brands. Consumers do lot of brand switching here. Consumers switch brands only for the sake of trying something new rather than dissatisfaction with the brand.
Answer:
A coordination failure.
Explanation:
A coordination failure is the term used for describing a situation when two or more people fail to reach a mutually beneficial equilibrium because they lack a way to synchronize their actions. Thus, a coordination failure simply occurs when two or more people or businesses are lacking coordination in their actions and as a result are unable to reach a mutually beneficial equilibrium or compromise.
Answer: The correct answer is "c. Many people are bothered by pollution in the area".
Explanation: The Coase Theorem points out that if property rights are well defined and transaction costs are zero, the negotiation between the parties will lead us to an optimal point of allocation in the market.
Whoever keeps the right will depend on the value of what each party produces and the costs of losing the right to property.
However, Coase's theorem ceases to be valid when there are high negotiation costs, for example between a company and thousands of inhabitants of an area (like in this case) or when property rights are not well defined (all parties believe they have the right to do what they want).
