The payback period is 4.06 years.
<h3>What is the payback period?</h3>
Payback calculates the amount of time it takes to recover the amount invested in a project from it cumulative cash flows
Amount recovered in the first year = 46,700 - 10,000 = 36,700
Number of years it would take to recover 36,700 = 1 + (36700 / 12,000) = 4.06 years
To learn more about the payback period, please check: brainly.com/question/25716359
#SPJ1
Answer:
$700 (not given in the options)
Explanation:
When the policy is purchased with a payment made in advance, the entries recorded are
Debit prepaid insurance $8,400
Credit Cash account $8,400
After the first month, the expense incurred is
= 1/12 × $8,400
= $700
Entries then required
Debit Insurance expense $700
Credit Prepaid Insurance $700
Students learn about how different work places work,and about what sort of work they might enjoy. employers get to "preview" people who might make good workers when they leave school. Schools learn what workplaces are needing from students and can adjust their their curricula to be more relevant.<span />
True , Cyclical unemployment can be negative.
Explanation:
Cyclical unemployment may be negative as well — when the economy hits its productivity and will be in the economic growth cycle process (works outside its PPC), then cyclical unemployment will be negative. The current unemployment rate is below the standard rate of unemployment.
The given statements are different in each scenario.
There are three elements of employment:
• Structural unemployment, which happens when Jobless people are also not qualified to work
• Frictional unemployment, due to the time needed to find one another by job-seekers and accessible employers
• Cyclical unemployment, because of the status of the business cycle unemployment
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.