Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis
Explanation:
Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.
When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).
Answer: Both Federal and State governments can tax citizens.
Explanation:
A concurrent power in this instance refers to powers shared by both the Federal government and the State government.
If taxing citizens is a concurrent power, it means that both the Federal and state government can tax citizens. This is why people in most American states pay both federal income taxes as well as state and companies pay Federal unemployment taxes as well as state as well.
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
The options to this question are:
A. Equality and justice
B. Reason and logic
C. Right and Wrong
D. None of the above
Your answer is option C or "right and wrong." Right and wrong is one of the most common principles of social acceptance in any society. If a person see's someone's action as right or correct they will be more willing to accept that person. While if that person sees someone commit wrong, they will become more concerns or willing to explain their concerns. This is called a moral compass, something all humans are born with.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
C. Internet Service Providers are not prohibited from disclosing the content of email messages to 3rd parties
Explanation:
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) is a law. It prohibits tapping or capturing communication over wires. There are other state laws that cover legalities about wiretapping.
Consent is required to capture electronic communication. In some states dual consent is required while in others single consent is sufficient.
Dual consent means both of the communicating parties must agree, while single consent means that one one party should agree. Electronic Communication Act was an amendment to the Title Third of Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (1968).
Answer:
<em>Say </em><em>if </em><em>u </em><em>were </em><em>going </em><em>to </em><em>court </em><em>and </em><em>ur </em><em>were </em>
<em>being </em><em>prosucuted </em><em>and </em><em>you </em><em>felt </em><em>like </em><em>there </em>
<em>making </em><em>u </em><em>say </em><em>something </em><em>ur </em><em>nor </em><em>trying </em><em>to</em>
<em>say </em><em>u </em><em>can </em><em>ask </em><em>for </em><em>an </em><em>attorney </em>
