1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dvinal [7]
3 years ago
12

Why should the state provide free legal assistance to thosecharged with really serious crimes?​

Law
1 answer:
viktelen [127]3 years ago
6 0

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

You might be interested in
Mr. X house burning down, inside there are two people his aged father who is in a wheelchair and a doctor who has discovered a c
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

I would save my father.

Explanation:

Even if my father is in a wheelchair and <em>old</em>. He is still my father. Maybe in the future I can so find a doctor that has the cure for the world's greatest cure of that disease.

6 0
2 years ago
Most prison gangs are based on the inmate's
Rudik [331]
The answer is D.Race and ethnicity
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Unit 2 Critical Thinking Questions Please Help!
mart [117]

Answer:

1. Which theory discussed in the lesson do you think best explains why crime happens? Why do you think that this theory is best?

I believe the psychoanalytic theory best explains why people commit crimes because it goes into peoples personalities, and our minds are where all of the answers truly are.

2. Do you think that individuals accused of crimes should be able to use an insanity defense? Why or why not?

I think that if the individual really was sick or insane at the time, then they should be able to use the defense. But not everybody should be allowed to claim insanity to get out of crime, tests need to be done.

3. Do you think that weather affects crime? Why or why not? Explain some of the ways that scholars think weather and/or the time of day may affect criminal behavior?

I believe that weather does affect crime, when its hot out people become more irritated and are most likely to commit crime compared to when its cold out. Scholars think that extreme hot and cold temperatures keep people away from each other and that this creates fewer opportunities for crimes like assault. The time of the day also affects the opportunity of a crime, as people are often in situations riper for crimes like assaults during the evening hours and on weekends.

4. Modeling theory suggests that we learn aggressive and violent behavior. Do you think that violence in the media (including movies, television, and video games) has any effect on criminal behavior? Why or why not? Do you think that anything should be done to censor violence in the media?

I do understand why violence in the media can portray individuals actions. People see these acts commited and may take into their own account to commit them. But everyone has had thoughts on their own, to fight a sibling or a friend. These can happen without even playing a movie with violence in it. I also believe that many people can recognize what appropriate ways to defend themselves without shooting someone. It is about recognizing what is appropriate and what is not.

5. Eysenck argues that certain personality types are more likely to engage in criminal behavior. Do you think that our personalities contribute to whether we commit crimes or not? Why or why not?

I think that our personalities contribute to crimes that are committed. If someone had social problems and anger issues, they would be more likely to commit a crime compared to a properly socialized person who has their anger under control.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
_______ is a Group of people who decide a case after hearing the evidence
azamat

Answer:

A jury is a Group of people who decide a case after hearing the evidence

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the Supreme Courts interpretation of the 14th Amendment and use of selective incorporation a
hram777 [196]

Answer and Explanation:

The 14th amendment cannot be a violation of the concept of federalism, as federalism is in accordance with the concepts covered in the Bill of Rights and only allows for the separation and sharing of powers between state and federal governments if this does not hurt the concepts covered by the Bill of Rights. These concepts are strengthened with the 14th amendment and for this reason, we should not consider that this amendment could harm the concept of federalism.

The ability of a state to create its own laws must be maintained even if people can move from one state to another, because this allows states to organize and maintain order in their territories, independent of their inhabitants. In this case, the individual who is moving from state to state must adapt to the laws of the territory, so that he/she can remain in the place.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A law which promotes the opportunity for foreign workers to obtain employment, housing, and medical care regardless of their cit
    5·1 answer
  • We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provi
    12·2 answers
  • It's a good idea to take a nap or call a rideshare service _____.
    6·1 answer
  • Did Carole baskin killed her husband
    5·2 answers
  • What is the 6 -digit grid coordinate for federal state market in grid square EG0093? JROTC ARMY
    8·1 answer
  • 1. $ stands for symbols
    11·2 answers
  • What is a promise given in exchange for performance?
    12·1 answer
  • HELP PLEAE<br><br> HOW PLAY AMOG US111
    9·2 answers
  • Which is a true statement about James McCulloch of McCulloch v. Maryland?
    8·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast enumerated and implied powers in TWO paragraphs describing the similarities and differences between these t
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!