1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Step2247 [10]
3 years ago
14

What cause for imperialism is evident in this map of africa

History
1 answer:
Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago
8 0
Sometimes called "The Scramble for Africa", European Imperialism was caused by the loss of American colonies during 1700 and 1800s, As a result, France, Britain, Portugal, Spain, Germany fought for African territory to replace their lost American work force and source of raw materials.
You might be interested in
1. Why did Texas become involved in WWI?
const2013 [10]
Because Germany had sent mexico a telegram that promised to give them Texas back & the telegram was interupted by UK who sent it to Texas
8 0
3 years ago
Why did the Zimmermann telegram anger Americans?
Contact [7]

Answer:

Not sure but I think it's D) The note threatened to take Texas and U.S. territory and give it back to Mexico

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How well was the system of mercantilism enforced by England?
777dan777 [17]
In case of England, the system of mercantilism was never inconsistently enforced. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". England used the mercantilism system in case of its colonies very well. This system was created in favor of the mother nation.
7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
jeka94

Answer:

OKAY SELECT RIGHT PARAGH FROM THIS

Explanation:

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

6 0
2 years ago
Most historians consider Alexander Hamilton to have been a successful Secretary of the Treasury because he
satela [25.4K]

Most historians consider Alexander Hamilton to have been a successful Secretary of the Treasury because he established a sound financial plan for the new nation.

Answer: Option B

<u>Explanation:</u>

Due to his financial plan, there was tremendous economic growth, which also created a lot of influence for the new nation which was slowly gaining its shape. Alexander Hamilton, during his tenure as the Secretary of the Treasury, devised a sound financial plan for the new nation.

History suggests that although his financial policies were successful, it invited a lot of criticism from a lot of government officials as some believed that he was given a lot of authority and autonomy.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main argument of the declaration of the rights and grievances of the colonies?
    8·1 answer
  • This quote is from an article by the reformer Jacob Riis that appeared in a New York City newspaper in 1891:
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the author of Berlin wall document
    15·2 answers
  • In a given year, US exports were $5 billion and imports were $16 billion. What was the US trade deficit or trade surplus that ye
    14·2 answers
  • What was the Three-Fifths Compromise at the Constitutional Convention?
    5·1 answer
  • De donde obtenian su poder los monarcas?
    8·1 answer
  • You invest $4,000.00 for six months at a 4.25% APR. How much interest will you earn?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the Long March?
    12·1 answer
  • Economy of the north
    6·1 answer
  • Write the process of the formation of District Co-ordination Committee.<br> Answer it fast plz
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!