<span>One
firm that is historically low and deals with negatively correlated stock
markets is Gold Extraction Companies. They are have very low correction with
overall stock markets. The basic reason for this low correlation is that, as
the stock market become bearish, investor sentiment becomes weak, due to which
most of the investors withdraw their money from stock market. Now once investor
has withdrawn the money from stock market , they search on safe investments
which will provide them good reruns, Gold is one of the investment which is
relatively safe and provide high returns. Thus withdrawn money from the share
market is invested in gold by investors. Thus Gold prices and companies related
to extraction of gold have very less correlation to the gold.</span>
Answer:
d. to regulate interstate commerce
Explanation:
The United States Constitution has the commerce clause in Article 1 Section 8 which allows the Congress to control the commerce with other nations and among the states.
According to this clause, the Congress can regulate the commerce that takes place between states and because of that, the answer is that the Constitution expressly grants the power to regulate interstate commerce to Congress.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": competitive intelligence.
Explanation:
Competitive intelligence refers to gathering and analyzing corporate information that could affect a firm's competitive advantage. Thanks to the information gathered companies can mirror other institution's good practices to increase efficiency and effectiveness, thus, revenue.
Answer:
The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.
Explanation:
Now, lets take each Answer option separately and see why only B is correct.
Option A is no longer legally accepted or ethical. Perhaps during the era of segregation back in 1960s' this option could have been acceptable. But today it is illegal and is considered as a violation of basic human rights.
Option C is not correct as well because although people with special needs and physical requirements are entitled to receive certain special treatments, paying them more solely based on their disability is not considered suitable nor ethical.
Option D is unacceptable. No one can assume that men have more stamina than women. There are competent, strong and qualified women who can do their jobs much better than men. So we cannot accept this as an answer.
Option E is incorrect as well. Although a person could be an immigrant, once that person has lawfully taken the citizenship of a country, that "immigrant" is considered as a "citizen" of that country (this is not applicable for illegal immigrants!).
However, we can take option B as the answer. This is because when comparing a new employee with a more experienced employee, we can't see any problem in paying the experienced employee more.
It is so they have more money for the business
