Answer:
Case summary:
D is a college alum gets trapped in a blizzard on his way home. He was furnished with nourishment and haven by an old couple and he returned home once the climate was clear. D's dad F guaranteed the couple to pay $500 recorded as a hard copy for their assistance and the couple acknowledged. In any case, as D and F had contrasts later, F denied paying that sum.
Case investigation:
Thought: Consideration is the advantage or worth got by the gathering for satisfaction of their guarantee. On the off chance that there is no thought, the agreement isn't enforceable. Following are the components of thought:
-
Lawfully adequate worth: The thought ought to have some an incentive under the lawful arrangements.
-
Dealt trade: The thought ought to give the chance to deal between the gatherings. It implies one gathering should return something of significant worth to the next gathering for execution of that party.
For instance, an individual A guarantees B that he would pay $1,000 for driving him to chip away at that day. Here. An is paying $1,000 for B as an arrival for driving him to work (execution).
A guarantees him to give him a vehicle as he was graduated. It isn't thought since B didn't vow to perform anything. It is only a present for B from A.
Past Consideration: The guarantees which were made by a gathering for the presentation of activities in past by another gathering are unenforceable. As there is no anticipated trade component, it is no thought.
Right now, old couple gave haven to D. They neither guarantee D to give cover nor bartered that he ought to give them something to return.
F guaranteed them to pay $500 as a demonstration of thankfulness for their assistance yet it is a present for their assistance in past. In this way, it isn't past thought.
Consequently, the couple can't hold F at risk for making the installment for giving haven to his child.
Answer:
Not marketing sales event informal
Explanation:
Since Larry wants to hold an event that covers Dual Special Needs Plans (SNP) which are Medicare Plans that intend to help limit membership as well as helpntailor to people with a specific diseases in which he will be using slide presentation that was provided by United Healthcare to help explain the plan benefits and as well help the consumers to complete their enrollment applications at the end this means that the type of event that Larry need to conduct will be NOT MARKETING SALES EVENT INFORMAL reason been that United Health care enables people or individual to gain access to the services that address the most important and significant causes of disease and death in which they as well ensures that all the quality of the services they rendered is good enough to help improve the health and vitality of the people who receive their services.
Questions is incomplete. It's last line is: *Jim's decided to get dinner worth that amount*
Answer:
- Alexander's Loss Aversion
- Jim's Mental accounting.
Explanation:
Loss Aversion: Some people are always frightened of losing and always try to avoid it by making irrational decisions which make their sufferings worst. <em>This</em> <em>scenario</em> is the example of loss aversion where the focus on gains is lost but all they see are failures.
- <em>It is a common decision-making mistake people go for during which they will not leave until the loss is not realized </em>
In Alexander's case: He is trying to avoid losses and hoping that his investment would be saved although, the company he has invested in will soon go bankrupt. He should realize that before it gets too late and end up his sufferings.
Mental Accounting: It refers to the spending behavior by which people categorize the money they have often without logic.
For example: A person monthly earning is $40, but suppose he gets only $30 for whatever reason, and he has to pay rent which is $35. So he is 5 dollars short but he had decided that he will eat chocolate worth $5 next month, so he will go for that chocolate even if he is short.
In Jim's case: He got $50 which he didn't have before, he could have used it for better purposes, than going to a dinner. Because he didn't have that amount before that.
Correct/Complete Question:
Marcus is the best-performing development director his non-profit organization has ever had. He possesses countless tricks and tips to continue to bring in donations, positive publicity, and supporters. Marcus would likely have _____ over new development department staff.
a. coercive power
b. group power
c. referent power
d. expert power
e. democratic power
Answer:
D, expert power.
Explanation:
Expert power is a type of power that a manager possesses which is as a result of subordinates' belief in their superior's credibility.
This simply means that subordinates in an organization believe that a certain superior has a special set of skills that other superiors do not have and as such give him the expert power.
From the above, it can be seen that expert power is subject to subordinates.
Like the question, Marcus has expert power as he is believed by his staff that he has the skills to bring in donations, publicity , etc; something that other directors before him did not have.
I hope this helps.