The second child is about 19lbsif you want to round it otherwise it's 18 something lbs, so the first child is about... 57.
Answer:
(a)
Distance from player should be 13.82 feet or 36.2 feet
(b)
The ball will go over the net
Step-by-step explanation:
we are given
The ball follows a path given by the equation
where
x and y are measured in feet and the origin is on the court directly below where the player hits the ball
(a)
net height is 8 ft
so, we can set y=8
and then we can solve for x
we can use quadratic formula
So, distance from player should be 13.82 feet or 36.2 feet
(b)
we can plug x=30 and check whether y=8 ft
we know that
height of net is 8 ft
so, the ball will go over the net
Grid lines to the right represent positive numbers for the first coordinate. 3 of them will put you on a grid line with a value of 3×0.5 = 1.5.
You now know enough to select the correct answer, ...
... (1.5, -2.5)
_____
You can confirm this is the correct answer by figuring the second coordinate. Down represents negative numbers, so down 5 units is -(5×0.5) = -2.5. This matches the second coordinate of the chosen answer.
Answer:
Our score = 0.60, Amanda's score = 0.25
Step-by-step explanation:
For Amanda
μ = 15 , σ = 4
z- score for X = 16 is (From z table)
z = (X - μ)/σ = (16 - 15)/4 = 0.25
For us
μ = 310 , σ = 25
z score for X = 325 (From z table)
z = (325-310)/25 = 0.60
Since our z score is better than Amanda's z score, we can say we did better
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
Use a rigid transformation to prove that angle NPO is congruent to angle NLM
=====================================================
Explanation:
The AA stands for "angle angle". So we need two pairs of angles to prove the triangles to be similar. The first pair of angles is the vertical angles ONP and MNL, which are congruent. Any pair of vertical angles are always congruent.
The second pair of angles could either be
- angle NOP = angle NML
- angle NPO = angle NLM
so we have a choice on which to pick. The pairing angle NOP = angle NML is not listed in the answer choices, but angle NPO = angle NLM is listed as choice B.
Saying angle NLM = angle LMN is not useful because those two angles are part of the same triangle. The two angles must be in separate triangles to be able to tie the triangles together.
We would use a rigid transformation to have angle NPO move to angle NLM, or vice versa through the use of a rotation and a translation.
