Answer:
see the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
we now that
A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form 
or 
In a proportional relationship the constant of proportionality k is equal to the slope m of the line <u><em>and the line passes through the origin</em></u>
In this problem we have
This is the equation of the line in slope intercept form
where
The given equation not represent a proportional relationship, because the line not pass through the origin
In a proportional relationship the value of b (y-intercept) is equal to zero
Answer:
3 segundos
Step-by-step explanation:
De la pregunta anterior, se nos dice que:
En un evento de natación, Mario hizo el curso en ¾ de minuto
1 minuto = 60 segundos
Por lo tanto = 3/4 de minuto
= 3/4 × 60 segundos
= 45 segundos
David completó el curso en 4/5 de un minuto.
1 minuto = 60 segundos
Por lo tanto = 4/5 de un minuto
= 4/5 × 60 segundos
= 48 segundos
La diferencia entre los dos competidores se calcula como
48 segundos - 45 segundos
= 3 segundos.
Por lo tanto, la diferencia entre los dos competidores = 3 segundos.
Answer:
Next 2 terms: 0, 3
Step-by-step explanation:
The patter in +3, +3, -3, -3
-3 + 3 = 0
0 + 3 = 3
3 - 3 = 0
0 - 3 = -3
-3 + 3 = 0
0 + 3 = 3
Answer:
Independent sample t test
Step-by-step explanation:
The Independent sample t test could be explained as a statistical test carried out in other to establish or examine if significant difference exists between two independent samples. That is the outcome of the samples do not depend on one another. Using the scenario described above, the difference between the same variable is measured for two different groups which is the ideal set up for an independent sample t test. The difference between test score for two independent samples (those who attended the workshop and those who did not) is being compared.
<span>1.
Photo description: A picture of the Eiffel tower, to be stuck on a mat.
Dimensions (including units): 4 in x 6 in
2. Since 2x would be added to each dimension:
Length: 6 + 2x (inches)
Width: 4 + 2x (inches)
3. Area: A = LW = (6+2x)(4+2x) square inches
4. F: (6)(4) = 24, O: (6)(2x) = 12x, I: (2x)(4) = 8x, L: (2x)(2x) = 4x^2
Polynomial expression: Adding the FOIL terms up: 4x^2 + 20x + 24
5. The area should be in square inches, since we multiplied length (in inches) by width (in inches).
6. Multiply factors using the distribution method:
(6+2x)(4+2x) = 6(4+2x) + 2x(4+2x) = 24 + 12x + 8x + 4x^2 = 24 + 20x + 4x^2
This is identical to the expression in Part 4.
7. x: 24 + 20x + 4x^2
If x = 1.0 in: Area = 24 + 20(1) + 4(1)^2 = 48 in^2
If x = 2.0 in: Area = 24 + 20(2) + 4(2)^2 = 80 in^2
8. If a white mat costs $0.03 per square inch and a black mat costs
$0.05 per square inch, determine the cost of each size of black and
white mat.
x Total area of mat Cost of white mat Cost of black mat
1.0 in, A = 48 in^2, (0.03)(48) = $1.44, (0.05)(48) = $2.40
2.0 in, A = 80 in^2, (0.03)(80) = $2.40, (0.05)(80) = $4.00
9. The cheapest option would be the white mat with 1-in margins on all sides, which would cost $1.44. Without any further criteria on aesthetics or size limitations, this is the most viable option.</span>
