Kersaint and Saint-Maurice's arguments were different from that of the nationalists because:
- The nationalists argued that only the people that were born in the nation and had a shared history were to be regarded as citizens within the country.
<h3>Who were the nationalists?</h3>
These group of people were those that were regarded as the free men of color. They wanted a country were people would be free and have same rights.
The country of Haiti was under the colonization of the French at the time. Kersaints wanted the black to have their freedom only after they had met with certain conditions.
Saint Maurice on the other hand wanted the people to have equal rights and freedom . He wanted a situation where no body would be under the mercy of another.
Read more on Saint Dominique here:
brainly.com/question/6169880?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
A. Roads, hospitals, and monuments were built
B. Buddhism spread through missionary monks.
They believed that the north would very easily squash the confederates and thought it might be an amusing show.
Answer:
The Anglo colonists, as the name implies, were people from the United States who were mostly of British descent. They can be divided in two groups: those who came from the neighboring Louisiana, and expanded the slave plantations in Eastern Texas, and those who came from Appalachia, and founded small farms in Central Texas.
The Tejanos were the original colonists of Spanish descent, who came from other parts of Mexico. They spoke Spanish, were catholic, and had ties to Latin America. However, they were also part of the independece movement in Texas, but many of them opposed the annexation of the state to the United States (this was supported en masse by the Anglos for obvious reasons).