The answer is !5/ 4 because when dividing a fraction by a fraction you multiply the first fraction by the second fractions reciprocal.
Answer:
C=$0.33L-$43.76
I hope this is good enough:
Answer:
150:200
Step-by-step explanation:
You can simplify it too. 3:4
Answer:
- not linear
- somewhere between 184 and 186 (maybe)
Step-by-step explanation:
As you show, the weight differences are different for the same week differences, so the table is not linear. A graph (attached) can also show you the table is not linear.
__
The highest rate of weight loss shown in the table is 7 lbs in 3 weeks, or 4 2/3 pounds in 2 weeks. The lowest rate of weight loss shown in the table is 5 lbs in 3 weeks, or 3 1/3 pounds in 2 weeks. Based on the rates shown in the table, we might expect the starting weight to be between 3 1/3 and 4 2/3 pounds more than the first table value:
Week 0 weight: between 184 1/3 and 185 2/3 lbs, estimated.
_____
A "line of best fit" for the data has a y-intercept of about 185 pounds, which is the midpoint between our two estimates above.
Area of rectangle = 24/54 square miles
length(L) = 5/9 miles
width (W)= ?
area = L * W
25/54 = 5/9 * W
W = (25/54) / (5/9) = (25 * 9) / (54 * 5)
W = 5/6 miles