Explanation:
Islam didn’t prosper in Central Africa because Islam was meant for regions with radical geographical inequalities.
That is, Islam is a desert religion… and Central Africa is a wet tropical region without the geographic inequalities of the desertic lands. Islam simply was not needed there.
So, let’s ellaborate: the main argument of the article is that Islam was born as a desert religion in a region characterized for very wealthy and productive “pockets” of arable land located amidst large regions of un-arable desert (this is, radical geographic inequality). This meant that the inhabitants of the poor lands had little incentive to invest in any kind of capital acumulation and, instead, every incentive to raid and take what the rich pockets produced. The resulting equilibrium meant a state of perpetual unstability and conflict between these two parts of the population.
Islam solved this through an economic doctrine of both static and dynamic redistribution. In essence, the “rich” regions were obligated to pay a religious tax given then to the “poor” regions and capital accumulation was prevented. In the words of the authors:
Answer:
A,C and,E
Explanation:
I just took the assignment
Actually I disagree with A. The north implemented the anaconda plan not the south. I would say C. Because during the anaconda plan people started starving in the south. The north had blocked off all ships that went to deliver food or goods to the south. Of course the occasional smuggler got through but that wasn't enough to feed the entire south. Their long coastline gave them the advantage because they managed to get some goods through. As well as to the Mississippi which also gave them ways to move goods.
Based on the amino acid sequence data for the Cytochrome-C protein, chimpanzees and humans share an identical coding sequence. Another species identified on the chart that is similar to the two would be the Rhesus Monkey, with is completely identical with 0 differences to the humans/chimpanzees.
