True, since they carefully copied throughout the centuries.
hopefully my answer helps!
(if my answers helped you please tell me, therefore I know.. that I did them correctly. anyways, have a great day/night!)
The correct answer for 1 is D.) Gideon v. Wainwright
The correct answer for 2 is C.) University of California v. Bakke to describe affirmative action policies that negatively affected whites.
The correct answer for 3 is C.) Brown v. Board of Education
All three cases dealt with human rights and spreading equality and improving the society.
Answer:
Both sources present the dangers that would occur if Singapore became an independent state.
Explanation:
The two sources present the danger that Malaysia would be in if Singapore became an independent and communist state. This concern began with preparations for Singapore to separate from the British Empire and merge with Malaysia. The problem was that communist ideologies were very influential in Singapore, but were prevented from being established because of the presence of the British Empire. However, once singapore became an independent state, communist ideologies could dominate and cause Singapore to try to dominate malaysia and not merge.
In this case, we can confirm that the similarity of these two sources is the subject that they address, which is the same.
The law helped unify the Muslim society because the law states that everyone on this earth is equal, and that behavior and how you treat others plays a huge role on how they unite. The Muslims pray together, break fast together, and work together. That is what made the Muslim society strong and held it from breaking apart. <span />
