1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kazeer [188]
3 years ago
11

How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs

Social Studies
1 answer:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
7 0

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


You might be interested in
True or False:
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What is the value of x?
hram777 [196]

Answer: 9

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Explain two things that can lead to a husband having a problem with his wife.
Mariana [72]

Answer:

Communication and Trust Issues

Explanation:

<em>*If this a specific question with a specific answer then I have no clue.*</em>

Two of the many things that can lead to problems in a marriage is lack of communication and trust issues. If there isn't clear transparency of communication that can lead to misunderstanding and/or even divorce.  <u>Communication is key to most relationships</u> and lack of communication can also affect other aspects of one's life. If a husband isn't communicating to his wife of what he needs or vice versa, then that could make for some pretty  difficult arguments down the road. Trust issues can also affect a relationship very deeply. Trust issues are one of the things that can drive people apart. A lack of trust in a relationship and lead to resentment and frustration which can put a strain on one's mental state and marriage.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone pls help answer true or false
KIM [24]

Answer:

1. true

2. true

3. true

4. false

5. true

6. true

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
After people first react to good or bad events, their feelings and reactions tend to dampen down over time and they return towar
Kipish [7]

Answer:

adaptation                    

Explanation:

Adaptation: In psychology, the term adaptation is described as the propensity of an organism to adapt or adjust within its environment. Through the adaptation process, human beings tend to match his or her original experiences and a few new experiences and hence these may not even fir together.

The concept of adaptation was proposed by one of the famous psychologist named Jean Piaget and is considered as one of the important parts in cognitive development.

In the question above, the given statement signifies the adaptation process.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Determine whether the following statement is true or false. Explain. Inferences based on voluntary response samples are generall
    8·1 answer
  • What caused Chief Pontiac's rebellion against the British after the French and Indian War?
    13·1 answer
  • The impact of this new technology on a specific society
    9·1 answer
  • What did the forest provide for the Iroquois
    10·1 answer
  • Keeva believes that she needs to show her children that she is in charge and has many strict rules about their conduct. At times
    7·1 answer
  • How old is Ghana and who is the president now​
    9·2 answers
  • The decline of the ________ Party gave way to the rise of the Republican Party throughout the country.
    10·1 answer
  • Which fact is correct about most food chain?
    7·1 answer
  • What does the constitution say about war.
    6·1 answer
  • The communication process model contains ___ elements that can be applied to conversations, public speaking, and any other metho
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!