1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kazeer [188]
3 years ago
11

How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs

Social Studies
1 answer:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
7 0

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


You might be interested in
Before their release, prison inmates are asked to fill out a risk assessment questionnaire. this questionnaire assesses the like
maw [93]

The scenario given above is an example of criterion validation. The criterion validity is a way of measuring an outcome related to it or it is a way of having to gain statement about a behavior of an individual and what would likely be the result base on his or her answers.

3 0
3 years ago
Anyone know the answer ?
alexgriva [62]
It’s should be the second choice or int this case b
8 0
3 years ago
The murder of entire populations, also referred to as genocide, that occurred during Hitler's rule of Germany is called
ohaa [14]
This specific genocide (there were also other kinds of genocide in the history, such as the Armenian Genocide) is known as the Holocaust (Holocaust refers mostly to the Jewish population). Around 6 million people died in this genocide, and in this number half are Polish Jews.
7 0
3 years ago
Eugenics and genocide most often are pursued in __________.
zalisa [80]
The correct answer is D

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
SHORT WRITING
omeli [17]

NAFTA - North American Free Trade Agreement created a larger scope of free trade covering United States, Canada and Mexico.

Explanation:

Major positive impact of this agreement is that it tripled the trade profits of Canada, Mexico and United states. It also removed tariffs which weer considered to be the international barriers. It increased the economic output which resulted in economic growth up to 0.5 % every year. Also Foreign investments are attracted. US oil imports from mexico was considered to be beneficial as there were no tariffs imposed by  US. This had a major impact on the economy.

The transportation costs lowered due to low gas price and the food prices were also marginalized. Each nation's government contracts became available to the major suppliers which increased competition and lowered the costs.

The negative impacts are, this agreement favored import and export industry but many labor oriented industries suffered a lot which included manufacturing, textile and electronic appliances due to which many started to migrate. The companies started to reduce their wages if they refused to work for them.

NAFTA agreement totally eliminated in doing good to the farmers. It subsidized the farm products and the farmers could not make profits due to  the lower farm prices which forced them to search for many other illegal jobs. They plunged into poverty and starvation.

The next impact is the degradation of the environment in Mexico. Farmers used many chemicals and pesticides to increase the production at that short period of time which resulted in unhealthy foods and deforestation resulted in global warming. No safety standard followed by the Mexican truck transport.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why and when did sc seced from the union
    9·1 answer
  • When sexually aroused, people perform poorly on measures of?
    10·2 answers
  • What is a way of dividing the power of government among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, each staffed separate
    5·1 answer
  • "We believe in creating loyal customers by providing a superior experience at a great value. We are committed to direct relation
    5·1 answer
  • Which country best exemplifies the revolutionary concept of mass media?
    14·1 answer
  • McCullough and Emmons (2001) contend that gratitude is the glue of cooperative social living among non-kin because gratitude ___
    13·1 answer
  • Which movement, whose development was independent of realism, based its aesthetics on nature, particularly on humanity's place i
    5·2 answers
  • What is american war​
    9·1 answer
  • Help ASAP I have a summative to d I need your help!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • The classified portion of the u.s. standing rules of engagement (sroe) is organized ______________ to facilitate quick reference
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!