Answer: I do think that people have difficulty talking to others face-to-face because of how prevalent texting is today. The reason for that is because we’ve gotten used to having time to think about our answer before sending our message. In general, there’s less pressure with texting than there is with face-to-face. You’re in front of the person you’re talking to and they’re able to monitor you closely, which could make some people uncomfortable and unable to think of anything to say. Another reason is because texting is able to be done without moving. It’s more convenient than meeting up with someone to discuss something.
<span>I'm 100% sure that the answer is: In a swot analysis, increasing gasoline prices would represent a potential correct opportunity for manufacturers of electric cars. It's pretty much cheaper to have the electric car and there're a lot of benefits for ecology. Also these cars are cheaper to manufacture due to less quantity of moving parts.</span>
Answer:
B) = $38.44
Explanation:
<em>Activity-based costing is a form of absorption costing where overheads are charged to product using cost drivers. Under this method, overheads are first analyzed and categorized by the activities responsible for them and then charged to product based on the amount of benefits enjoyed using cost drivers.</em>
Activity rate is calculated as:
<em>Activity cost for the period / Total cost drivers for the period</em>
<u><em>Activity rate for supporting customers:</em></u>
<em>The appropriate cost driver to allocate supporting customer activity is the number of customers as given. This is so because it is most likely that the number of customers served will be a major factor that influences the supporting customers activity costs. </em>
<u><em>Activity rate for supporting customers </em></u>
= Supporting customers overhead/total number of customers
= $34,600/(600+300)
= $38.44
Answer:
$31.9211
Explanation:
We discount the future two year dividends at the required rate of return
and solve for the present value of the infinite series of dividends growing at 3.6% with the dividend grow model:
PV 33.6
Then we discount this by the two years ahead of time these cashflow start and add them to get the PV of the stock which is their intrinsic market value
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Year&cashflow&PV\\&&\\1&3&2.7027\\2&2.4&1.9479\\2&33.6&27.2705\\&TOTAL&31.9211\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7DYear%26cashflow%26PV%5C%5C%26%26%5C%5C1%263%262.7027%5C%5C2%262.4%261.9479%5C%5C2%2633.6%2627.2705%5C%5C%26TOTAL%2631.9211%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
