Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
Answer:
The correct answer is A)
Explanation:
There is no good or service that is unlimited.
The concept of the Barter system was simply a method of exchanging value for value.
- It was phased away due to several reasons:
- It was not a good store of value as many of the goods were perishable
- it didn't make for good administration: It was too cumbersome and problematic. Imagine having to store three trailers of eggs awaiting a barter exchange
Cheers!
Answer: Moral hazard
Explanation: As per economic principles, if an individual increases the exposure to risk when covered by insurance, moral hazard happens, particularly when an individual takes further risks just because someone carries the burden of all those consequences.
There can be a moral hazard at which one party's policies may modify to the disadvantage of someone else after a business transaction has occurred. Moral hazard may arise through a type of asymmetric information in which the threat-taking group to trade is more aware of its motives than the person bearing the risk's implications.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A .
Answer: Compliance review
Explanation: A compliance review can be defined as an audit done with the objective to assess whether the company is following the regulatory guidelines. In such a review the auditor tries to determine if the items that being examined complies with the set standards.
In the given case, Drew is writing the report to spread the information that they are following all the guidelines related to safety and quality.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is C.
Answer:
13.02%
Explanation:
Debt = 30% and Common stock = 70%
Cost of equity is 16% and debt is 8%
Tax is 24%
WACC = Cost of equity*Weight of equity + After tax cost of debt*Weight of debt
WACC = (0.16*0.70) + (0.08*(1-0.24)*0.30)
WACC = 0.112 + 0.01824
WACC = 0.13024
WACC = 13.02%
So, the the company's WACC is 13.02%
