Answer:
Emotional reasoning fallacy
Explanation:
According to my research on different studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Eriqa is falling prey to the Emotional reasoning fallacy. This is when a person's emotions takes over our thinking entirely, blotting out all rationality and logic. Which is what is happening to Eriqa when she gets mad and lashes out at Sona, even if he has valid points.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
I'd say "d" considering all of the other options are very negative.
That changes in the independent variable caused changes in the dependent variable
Answer: What happened to members of some families who held differing views on independence?
They learned to compromise.
They were put on trial.
They did not speak to one another.
They moved back to England.
Explanation:
This is the correct option:
e. neither Buddhism nor Taoism ever offered an alternative to restrictive Confucian theology.
Explanation:
During the period when the Three teachings as Taoism Confucianism and Buddhism are sometimes called existed simultaneously and influenced Chinese culture, there was considerable overlap between them.
The permeability of one school of thought with the other meant that there is a way that a person could have believed in all three at a time.
Confucianism was more of a theological way of life while Buddhism would have been the spiritual underpinning of it.
