Its not true do its false
Answer:
to deliver electric shocks to a learner for giving incorrect answers
Explanation:
The Milgram obedience studies also known as the Milgram Shock Experiment was conducted at the Yale University which focused on the investigation of obedience to authority and personal conscience and that to what extent the participants are ready to go to be considered obedient. Stanley Milgram divided participants into teachers and learners and order the participants to deliver electric shocks to a learner for giving incorrect answers. This was a highly controversial research however, it highlighted the personal want for acceptance and reward in human beings.
Answer: A) stimulus
Explanation:
A stimulus is a factor which can bring a change in the chemical and physical structure of the organisms. The stimulus is the part of the external environment of organism. And the ability of the organism to respond to the stimulus is called as the sensitivity.
Here, music is the stimulus which brings causes you to start foot tapping which is a response towards this stimulus.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: How much if this did Kyler contribute and how much of this is interest, would be: 93.311.43 would be the total amount accrued by Kyler at the end of the 25 years of saving if the annual compound rate is maintained at 6.2%, and the rest would be the net savings done by Kyler if he maintains the rate of savings at 225 per month for all of the 25 years.
Explanation:
The good thing about savings on an account with compound interest rate is that at the end of the saving period, the total amount gained will be much larger than without it. This compound interest rate is simply the extra money that a person may get for literally investing his/her money in this case on a bank account that offers that rate of interest every year. Give or take a bit from taxes, at the end of the day, Kyler got a lot more money from just compound annual interest, than from his own hand.
In assessing the internal validity of an intervention, we try to determine if certain changes cause certain outcomes. It is relevant in studies that try to establish casual relationship. While in observational or descriptive studies, it is not that relevant. It is also possible to have internal validity in a study and not have construct validity. Example, imagine a study where you are looking at the effects of a new computerized tutoring program on math performance in first grade students.
