Huhhhhhhhh??????????¿¿¿????¿¿???
Answer:
This is effort justification
Explanation:
Kristen is justifying the effort of going to the Superbowl. She is saying she had a good time even though her team lost and the game was boring.
Answer:
c. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no reason to know of the deficiency (and did not have actual knowledge) when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on her.
Explanation:
The doctrine of <em>innocent spouse relief</em> might apply here. Mrs. Jones will have to prove that:
- the income that was omitted was earned by her husband, not her.
- she must prove that when she signed the tax filings, she was not aware of the omission.
- after examining all the facts surrounding the omission, the IRS must decide that blaming her would not be fair.
Answer:
d. $67 million.
Explanation:
The asset is not impaired because the fair value is higher than the book value. Therefore, the only operating loss of $67,000,000 can be reported.
Particulars Amount
Operating Loss(Jan 1 to 31 Dec 2021 $67,000,000
Before Tax loss on discontinued operation $67,000,000
Hence, Jamison would report a before-tax loss on discontinued operations of $67,000,000.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "b. his marketing should stress quality and service." As Jake began his market research he discovered that there wasn't another retail boating supplies business for hunting more than 100 miles in fact there was no large lake or river either Jake concluded that his<span> marketing should stress quality and service</span>
