Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
I beloved answer is 3 right dam
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
The sequence is not an arithmetic sequence. For a sequence to be arithmetic, the difference between consecutive terms is a constant number which is termed as the common difference.
This means that the difference between the second term and the first term must be equal to the difference between the third term and the second term.
In the sequence above, the first term is 10. The difference between the first and second term is 15. When the first term is subtracted from the second, what we get is 5.
Now, let’s look at the third term and the second term. The difference here is 21 minus 15 which equals 6. Now we can see that the common difference is not constant and thus we conclude that the series is not arithmetic.
