Answer:
the first one is the correct answer
Answer:
(a) We are morally required to save many lives at the expense of one life.
Explanation:
The Trolley Problem which was redifned by Phillipa Foot, an English PPhilosopher, in 1967 explain the ethical dilemma, where by, the main problem of this ethical philosophy deals about whether to:
1. Do nothing and allow the trolley to kill the five people on the main track.
2. Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person.
Hence, in this case, should Alf concludes that in the Trolley Problem the agent is morally required to pull the lever and divert the trolley, which will means, that, the Trolley will kill ONE person instead of FIVE. This implied that, Alf has concluded that "We are morally required to save many lives at the expense of one life."
The answer to your question is true
Answer:
D) The federal level
Explanation:
Federal elections such as the Presidential elections have their campaign fund which is called the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. The funds are gotten from about one percent of the citizens income tax. The funds are then giving to Presidential and Senatorial candidates to cover their campaign expenses.
This is why they have enough money to pay for expensive Television ads, billboards, and newspaper articles for publicity.
Its objective was to declare that the New World and the Old World to be separate entities. It opposed European colonialism in the new world. The Latin American countries were gaining independence from Spain and Portugal. The US was worried there would be new attempts by Old World countries to try and interfere with or try to conquer the newly independent territories and it would become a battleground. The doctrine was declared this. wouldn't be tolerated. The New world wanted to be left alone to exert its influence.
The threat of France possibly spreading the its monarchial government was a catalyst
