When the U.s supreme court decides a case, The chief justice writes a majority opinion if he or she was in the majority
The chief justice usually assign a trusted person to writes this opinion
hope this helps
Answer:
One of them was found guilty and the other was not
Explanation:
A conviction is when the court finds someone guilty of a crime and a acquittal is when the court finds the defendant not guilty of a crime.
Answer:
ATP and energy production in patients with Chronic Pain and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Explanation:
Chronic pain and Chronic fatigue are two conditions of explainable causes. Many time persons complain that they have to go through a battery of tests before they find that they have ruled out every possible disease and then there are no other choices left. There are no specific causes and there are no specific cures; although there has been strong correlation to traumatic events being a cause. Many patients are left to be treated with anti-anxiety, depression and ADD/ADHD medication to relieve a plethora of symptoms.
Recently isolated studies have been done to treat these conditions by fortifying the mitochondria and replenishing the electron transport chain with vital components such as Magnesium and Coq10. Over a 50% relieve has been reported on patients that add a few more supplements to their diet aside from these.
The breakthrough here is to understand how to treat a disease by providing what the body is lacking rather than shutting off the pain sensors which are reporting pain; a signal that there is trouble.
The concept here is that Chronic pain and chronic fatigue is of an unknown cause and has an unknown cure. What was intriguing was that a condition that is so debilitating can be managed with supplements available on the market. To explore this further would be to take these supplements myself and see the effect it has on a personal level.
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
These are all individual liberties because they all apply to the first amendment (Freedom of speech, religion, press, petition and expression) rights as well as they are things you can do on your own and usually do.
