Answer:
"Threat Of Substitutes"
Explanation:
According to my research, the five forces model is a framework for analyzing the competitive environment that a company is will be going up against. That being said, based on this model this type of threat is called the "Threat Of Substitutes". This is defined as "the level of risk that a company faces from replacement by its substitutes"
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The correct answer is: scrambled merchandising.
Explanation:
Scrambled merchandising refers to companies offering new products that are not necessarily related to their original business. This strategy is used when firms intend to boost their sales profits and is beneficial because the organization's store obtains the treat of one-stop shops. However, the lack of experience selling the new products could affect the business in the beginning.
Answer:
productivity is calculated by using formula
Explanation:
formula = total output/ total input
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
