For at least a year now, Ivon has felt positively about his city's efforts to remove statutes of confederate leaders from its squares and other public spaces. Ivon's evaluation is an example of:<u> an attitude</u>.
A person's attitude can be seen of as a psychological construct, a mental and emotional entity, or it can refer to the way they approach something or their viewpoint on something. Viewpoint, thoughts, and sentiments are all a part of attitude.
To modify attitudes, one can employ classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning. By connecting positive emotions with the target item, classical conditioning may be used to produce favourable emotional responses to a person, object, or event.
Ivon has felt positively about his city's efforts to remove statutes of confederate leaders. Hence his attitudes gradually changed.
To learn more about attitude, refer
brainly.com/question/3472120
#SPJ4
Platte, Mississippi, and Ohio river
Poop and your lungs and kidneys and bladders
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Different cultures respond ethically, morally, and politically to the pressures of modern industrial management in that they try to protect and maintain its own traditions and customs despite globalization and the continuing demand of corporation to produce more and more, not taking into consideration the human factor, the damage to the environment, and the respect for other cultures idiosyncracies.
It seems that modern industrial management is only focused on producing more results; more income through the selling of products and services. But they try to do this at all costs. Not considering people's way of thinking, belief systems, local history and traditions, and the respect of their own customs.
That is why most of the time multinational companies are not so well accepted in other countries. They created jobs, although most of the time are workers low paid jobs with minimum benefits. Some of these companies enter the country with fiscal privileges and pay minimum taxes and does not take care of the environment, wasting many natural resources that are much needed by the local people.
I believe the answer is: <span>B. had more control over their crops and supplies than was true in sharecropping.
In the share tenancy system, the farmers usually operate the land that is owned by other people, and they are required to give some percentage of the harvest to the owners as payment.
In this system, the owner would give the farmers with full freedom on the technique and operation of the land.
</span>
