Kyllo v. United States (2001) ruled that when the government uses a device that's not in use by the general public to "see" thin

Question

laila [671]

3 years ago

14

Kyllo v. United States (2001) ruled that when the government uses a device that's not in use by the general public to "see" thin

gs it could not without intrusion, that is a "search" and requires a warrant. True False

Social Studies

1 answer:

photoshop1234 [79] · Answer 1 · 2022-08-06T06:30:02+03:00

Answer: True

Explanation:

In Kyllo v. United States (2001), a 5-4 opinion was delivered by Justice Antonin Scalia in which the Court held that the Government used a device that is not in public use, to explore details of the home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion hence the surveillance is a 'search' and is unreasonable without a warrant.