The constitution was a result of multiple compromises.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Constitution was framed after various compromises done on the proposal of the delegates. The U.S constitution was a result to rectify the flaws found in the Article of Confederation. The proposed constitution was framed to strengthen the slave states in all important aspects.
The proposed constitution was also a result of the major compromise between Federalists and Anti-federalists. The Great compromise was settled after satisfying both the small and large states. It settled matters of enslavement and about President election.
Answer:
India and China
Explanation:
India and China dominated the world economic activity at the time of Columbus voyage in 1492 that discovered the New World. Trade very much conducted within the region between Asia and Europe through the Silk Route. The Silk Route is one of the oldest trade routes that linked China to the western world. The Silk Road routes stretched from China through India, then reached to Europe crossing the deserts. Some of the goods that traded were silk, tea, porcelain, sugar, ivory, spices, cotton, wool, gold, and silver.
Answer: A is the answer
Explanation: A slave would count as three-fifths of a person when counting population for representation,
Answer:
A period of violence during the French Revolution incited by conflict between two rival political factions, the Girondins and the Jacobins, and marked by mass executions of “the enemies of the revolution.” The death toll ranged in the tens of thousands, with 16,594 executed by guillotine
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
2) “Separate but unequal” schools are unconstitutional.
Explanation:
This is a statement from the outcome of the historical <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> lawsuit, which basically stated that "separate but equal" schools and facilities are unconstitutional.
From the passage, we can extract the words "the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place...Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs . . . are . . . deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment".
Essentially, this is saying that "separate but equal" is not actually equal, which means that the people (Brown) who sued the education district (Board of Education) were not awarded their full rights granted by the 14th Amendment - and that is unconstitutional.