The big difference is that today's judgments have a legal rite. People should be judged with dignity, which was not always the case at that time, and condemnation must be evidence-based, which was not always respected either.
Another difference is that today there is no judgment based on supernatural situations, as was the case of the Witches of Salem. For a judgment made under the aegis of democracy, crime must have motives that can be substantiated. Finally, people who are tried today have a broad right of defense, which was not the case in the Middle Ages.
"b. Women search for plant foods while men herd their domesticated animals" and "<span>c. They meet all of their food needs by killing animals" are not correct, since the fact that they have to hunt means they don't have any domesticated animals, and they could also get food from plants. </span>
The Taj Mahal was built with influences from Mughal and Turkish architectural styles.
Answer:
A
it caused the death of the most able and respected Byzantine emperor, Leo III
<span> 1. The constitution - the legislative branch cannot enact laws that violate the constitution. this limit is kinda limited in that the legislative branch could vote to change the constitution, but it would be extremely difficult and would also need ratification by 2/3 of the states.
2. the president- congress can pass laws, but they are not official laws until the president signs them. the president can refuse to sign a law the legislative branch has passed or veto them. with a super majoiity the legislative branch can override a veto though.
3. the people - the people vote for who is in the legislative branch. if we dont like what they do we can vote in new guys.</span>