Risk-adjusted discount rates are used for proposals with different levels or classes of risk.
hazard adjusted to go back is a degree to find how a whole lot return and funding will offer given the extent of risk-adjusted to it. It enables the investor to make a contrast between the excessive chance and the low-chance go-back funding.
Risk-adjusted go back on capital is a chance-primarily based profitability measurement framework for analyzing chance-adjusted economic overall performance and supplying a steady view of profitability across agencies. The concept was developed by Bankers who agree with principal designer Dan Borge in the overdue 1970s.
Any ratio above 1 is normally taken into consideration as excellent, with 2 to 3 being terrific and whatever beyond that an exquisite guess. In this manner, buyers can see the excess returns they could assume in a change in step with a unit of danger, as Mutual fund A may be taken into consideration the better funding although it returned much less on average.
Learn more about Risk-adjusted here brainly.com/question/23948730
#SPJ4
Answer:
A) They will rise.
Explanation:
In case when the demand for hybrid cars are in elastic so here the total revenue should be rises as due to the subsidy, the price would decline and the supply rises this results there is a rise in demand that shows elastic so the demand rise at high percentage as compared to decline percentage with respect to the level of price
Due to this, the revenue would increase
Hence, the correct option is A.
Having too little money and credit often means the level of money someone is borrowing is high. So they have little money and are paying finance charges. Second it becomes harder to take advantage of oppurtunities, so changing the situation is a challenge.
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Standard Quantity = 4,200
Actual Quantity = 4,700
Standard Price = $4
Cost = $4.10 per pound to produce 2,300 units
Direct Material Quantity variance:
= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity) × Standard Price
= (4,200 – 4,700 ) × $4
= $2,000 Unfavorable
Therefore, the direct materials quantity variance is $2,000 Unfavorable.
