Answer:
$34,310.45
Explanation:
Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator
Only projects with a positive NPV should be accepted. A project with a negative NPV should not be chosen because it isn't profitable.
When choosing between positive NPV projects, choose the project with the highest NPV first because it is the most profitable.
Cash flow in year 0 = $-200,000
Cash flow in year 1 - 5 = 65,000
I = 12%
NPV = $34,310.45
To find the NPV using a financial calculator:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
When resources are low, businesses know that they can increase their prices because people need them desperately.
Answer: In the second statement
Explanation: Supply and demand are two market forces which determines the price of a commodity. In simple words, the amount of commodity that the consumers are willing to buy at a given price is called demand and the producer are willing to sell is called supply. The situation in which the two are equal is called equilibrium.
If the demand for a product is higher than its supply then its price will increase and vice versa.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the second statement is correct.
Answer:
Explanation:
In order to earn money and produce goods that improve lives, self-directed gain would provide jobs, and subsequently wages for others.
The way people can become wealthy by their own efforts is to sell what they produce to others. As the business grows, labor is hired to produce more. This is the 'invisible hand' concept that turns self-directed gain into social and economic benefits for all.
Answer:
Option A is the correct approach.
Explanation:
- This is indeed a connection to compulsory tax and government expense stabilizers which weren't at the discretion including its government. Throughout the event of a recession, expenses are cut, rising discretionary income to something like the extent that the economic depression is pacified.
- Unemployment insurance, as well as other social programs, are consequently expanded without the clear intervention of the government
The other options offered are also not relevant to the scenario presented. So, the solution above is the right one.
