Answer:
- f^-1(x) = (3/8)(x +1) . . . . as written
- f^-1(x) = (x +5)/(3x -1) . . . with appropriate parentheses
Step-by-step explanation:
The inverse function can be found by solving for y:
x = f(y)
x = y + 5/3y -1 . . . . . . . . . . y +(5/3)y -1 . . . per order of operations
x+1 = 8/3y . . . . . . . . . . add 1
(3/8)(x +1) = y . . . . . . . . multiply by 3/8
f^-1(x) = (3/8)(x +1) . . . . . inverse of the function as written
_____
Perhaps you intend f(x) = (x+5)/(3x-1). The inverse is found the same way.
x = (y +5)/(3y -1)
x(3y -1) = y +5
3xy -x = y +5 . . . . . eliminate parentheses
3xy -y = x + 5 . . . . . add x-y
y(3x -1) = x +5 . . . . . factor out y
y = (x +5)/(3x -1) . . . divide by the coefficient of y
f^-1(x) = (x +5)/(3x -1) . . . . inverse of rational function
Step 1
find the perimeter of a <span>single enclosure
perimeter of a square=4*b
where b is the long side of a square
area square=b</span>²
area square=2025 ft²
b²=2025-------> b=√2025-----> b=45 ft
<span>so
perimeter=4*45-------> 180 ft
step 2
</span>find the perimeter of a two individual enclosure
<span>perimeter=4*20+3*40------> 200 ft
area=20*40*2------> 1600 ft</span>²
<span>
therefore
fencing singular enclosure < fencing two individual enclosure
180 ft < 200 ft
</span>area singular enclosure > area two individual enclosure
2025 ft² > 1600 ft²<span>
the answer is the option
</span><span>a The singular enclosure would minimize cost because it requires 180 feet of fencing.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
as long as the two shortest sides add up to more than the longest side then a triangle can be made with those side lengths
Answer: A y=4x^2+1
Step-by-step explanation:According to slope A is the answer
Answer:
55
Step-by-step explanation:
since b is 110, you will have to divide 110 by 2 to find out the answer of c because its a half of b and that leaves you with 55, also a is 55 two
c=55
a=55
d=30
