Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
The answer is D, citizens aren’t required to do this but the could and should.
Answer:
that he has to much involvement in the case
<h2>The answer is true .</h2>
<h2>As the eliquis perform the tasks of Henry's in the most rugged and difficult terrain .</h2>
answer:
an election in which a goverener is elected by the people to represent that state in congress
psa:
*please do not just copy my answer it was meant to help you not just give you anything to put down!
*if you think my answer is good or will get an A please give me brainliest or high stars.
*love yourself. you're beautiful, i promise.
*please treat people with kindness, wear a mask, and have a lovely day.