It is always the aim of the government that people take pride with the things that the locals in their land are able to produced. If this is the main aim of the government then, it should be a policy that one should buy the local products first. In line with this, the government may limit the amount of imported goods reaching their area as these imported good may jeopardized the aim to take pride in the local ones.
Answer:
The solution is given in the table file attached below
Explanation:
The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
Digital citizenship<span> can be defined as the norms of appropriate, responsible behavior with regard to technology use. 1. </span>Digital<span> Access: full electronic participation in society. Technology users need to be aware that not everyone has the same opportunities when it comes to technology.</span>
Answer:
C) $128.15
Explanation:
The computation of the intrinsic value of Innovative Components’ equity per share is shown below:
= Retained earnings ÷ number of shares issued × PE ratio
= $2,014,802 ÷ 402,500 shares × 24.6
= $128.15
We simply applied the above formula so that the intrinsic value of Innovative Components’ equity per share could come
and ignored the company PE ratio of 24.6
