Answer:
The answer is: $4,522
Explanation:
Since Stanford doesn't operate in the restaurant business and doesn't buy the restaurant, he cannot deduct any amount for investigation costs relating to the restaurant.
Stanford doesn't operate in the bakery business but he bought the bakery, so he can deduct up to $5,000 (before amortization) for investigation costs related to the bakery. But those $5,000 are reduced by every dollar he spent over $50,000, so he can only deduct $4,000 [= $5,000 - ($51,000 - $50,000)].
The remaining $47,000 (= $51,000 - $4,000) can be amortized over 180 months, which equals $261 per month (= $47,000 / 180 months).
Since he bought the restaurant in November, he can deduct two months: $261 per month x 2 months = $522
So his total deduction for investigation expenses is = $4,000 + $522 = $4,522
Given:
D = 40 pcs /hour
T = 36/60 = 0.60 hours
X = 0.20
C = 10
Find the value of N.
N = DT (1 + X) / C
N = [40/hr * 0.60 hr (1 + 0.20)] / 10
N = [24 (1.20)] / 10
N = 28.8 / 10
N = 2.88 or 3
3 containers should be used to support the operation.
Answer:
d. All of the last 12 payments he received are taxable.
Explanation:
In the case when the life expectancy is 180 months and collected 192 payments prior he died
So according to the question, all the 12 payments would be received are taxable
Here the payment that received for 180 months would not be involved in the gross income and the remaining 12 payment would be taxable
Therefore the option d is correct
Answer:
A. 2500
Explanation:
10,000 shares x $5 x .05= 2500
This kind of problem is known as price escalation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A divergence in estimating where merchandise have greater expenses in a remote market than in the local market because of transportation and sending out expenses is known as price escalation.
Price escalation can likewise allude to the total of cost factors in the circulation channels which mean a higher last expense for an item in a remote market.
