Answer:
obstacles - provide a challenge
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Ticket location is the most important attributes in the overall purchase decision. It is with a 39.49% of the general choice weight.
2. Verily, the conjoint assessment results are important in choosing assessing decisions. Ticket cost contained 38% of the examination. From the data, we can conclude fans are increasingly loath to purchase $60 tickets. By joining this ticket cost with various characteristics with higher utility scores, we can deliver a group that will be impressively all the more addressing the fans. The proportionate should be conceivable with the other evaluating decisions to make various group offers .The Portland Trail Blazers' NBA foundation was in a terrible position. Fans were spilling out the door, and the players couldn't find the bushel. The gathering wore a 22-36 record and advance managers presently ran its home, the Rose Garden after its owners had proclaimed money related indebtedness. The gathering's guide had been ended for sure. The field had been a sellout just three years earlier, and the gathering had been dear by Portland. However, starting in the 2003 season, interest began to fall pointedly by more than 15 percent by 2005. In the midst of a comparative time, 42 of 70 indulgence suites sat void in the midst of the period. More Portland crowd individuals viewed the atmosphere by then Blazers' amusements.
3. Yes there could be more than one.
By looking at the conjoint assessment and other data open from the survey, I believe that the Portland Trail Blazers the officials should offer two unmistakable packs. One being either six or ten redirections for each group. Disregarding the way that organization lean towards the six preoccupation pack, giving fans the decisions to buy for ten diversions will empower the gathering to sell more tickets. Regarding seating, they should offer the mid 300 court seats, averaging between $40-50
Answer:
20%
Explanation:
Ownership of XYZ Corp. in ABC Partnership = 100% of ABC Partnership * Percentage owned by XYZ Corp.
= 100% * 50%
= 50%
Ownership of Nancy = Interest in ABC Partnership + Ownership of XYZ Corp. in ABC Partnership * Interest of Nancy In XYZ Corp.
= 10% + (50% * 20%)
= 10% + 10% = 20%
Answer:
The incremental benefit cost ratio is less than 1 therefore we must select site 1.
Explanation:
The incremental BCR can be determined using the following formula
8% , 10)
⇒ 
⇒ 
8%, 20)
⇒ 
⇒
= $203,704.42
Incremental initial investment = 203,704.42 - 149,029.49
= $ 54,674.93
Incremental benefits = 580,000 - 520,000 = 60,000
Incremental O&M = 75,000 - 80,000 = - $ 5000
Incremental Disbenefits = 140,000 - 90,000 =$ 50,000
All solving using the present worth method also incremental benefit cost ratio comes out to be 0.2743.
The incremental benefit cost ratio is less than 1 therefore we must select site 1.
Answer: The correct answer is "recorded in equity recorded in equity, as part of other comprehensive income.".
Explanation: Gains or losses on cash flow hedges are <u>recorded in equity, as part of other comprehensive income.</u>
<u>The gains or losses of a cash flow hedge must be recorded, as part of other comprehensive income, in equity.</u>
