1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alik [6]
3 years ago
11

A broker received a very high offer on a piece of property from a buyer. Bill makes a low offer through a "dummy" purchaser, or

an accomplice who is not a buyer at all. Bill then sells the property to the buyer for the higher price, with the difference being profit. What's the violation?
Business
1 answer:
Semenov [28]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Secret Profit

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Jeff and Ryan rent a house from Mike and Yolanda Reynolds. They are three months behind in their rent and neighbors have been co
Nady [450]

Answer:

C) Yes, Yolanda is correct. It is illegal for Mike to take such actions. The landlords may serve the tenants with a three-day notice of eviction.

Explanation:

Eviction processes can be relatively simple, by just sending an eviction notice and the tenants voluntarily leaving the property, or they can be very messy and end up in court. But in no case, can the landlord just get into the property and kick the tenants out.

The length of the eviction process also varies depending on the cause, in this case since the tenants already we more than 3 months of rent tht is more than sufficient cause.

If after the 3 day notice Jeff and Ryan still haven't left, then Yolanda and Mike will have to start an eviction lawsuit that usually takes a few weeks (its a speedy process). Since Yolanda and Mike have a reasonable cause for evicting the tenants, the court will probably order and immediate eviction (or maybe give them a week or so).

Then if Jeff and Mike still stay on the property things get messy and the police should force them out.  

5 0
3 years ago
Marty is collaborating with collegues to plan a surprise party for their boss. Marty does not add an ideas to the party but choo
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:

a passive

Explanation:

Passive behavior is when an individual decides not to act or react but follow what others want. In passive, an individual does not express their feeling or thoughts. They remain inactive and allows others to take control. behavior

Marty attended the meeting but decided not to make any contributions. By deciding to follow the flow, he exhibited passive behavior. Marty felt angry because he failed to express his honest feelings, thoughts, and beliefs. He violated his rights to speak and be heard.

3 0
3 years ago
I have a signed contract with one company this company sold my contract to another company that did the work and it wasn't done
schepotkina [342]
In specifics, it depends on the written up sales contract that the first company arranged with the one that did the work. But personally, I'd blame the second company. Personal opinions don't matter when it comes to legal matters though.. sorry.
7 0
3 years ago
The Allowance for Bad Debts account has a credit balance of $ 5 comma 000$5,000 before the adjusting entry for bad debts expense
GaryK [48]

Answer:

62,200 allowance ending

Explanation:

allownce 5,000 credit

<u>Because the bad debt is calculate over the sales,</u> the bad debt expense is the result of that estimated, without considering the beginning balance of the allowance.

22% of net credit sales will be uncollectible:

260,000 x 22% = 57,200

<u>Now ending balance will be beginning + uncollectible for the period</u>

5,000 beginning

57,200 uncollectible for the period

62,200 allowance ending

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Three people invest in a business. The first two invest in the ratio 2:3, and the third person
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

$15 million

Explanation:

The three investors' total investments would add up to  100% or 1.

The first two invested in the ration of 2:3

It means ;

Investor 1:  2/5

Investor 2: 3/5

If investor 3 invested twice as investor 1 and 2, then we can deduce that he invested ( 2/5 + 3/5) x 2

the  new denominator is 10, meaning

Investor 1 had 2/10,

investor 2 had 3/10

investor 3 had 5/10

If total investments were $30 million, then the highest investor invested

5/10 x $30million

=0.5 x $30 million

=$15 million

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these describes installment loans
    15·2 answers
  • Free-market economies have _____ .
    14·2 answers
  • A buyer with a $242,000 loan has a monthly principal and interest payment of $1,317.66. If $1,033.54 is interest, what’s the new
    15·1 answer
  • If Ben invests $3500 at 4% interest per year, how much additional money must he invest at 5 1 2 % annual interest to ensure that
    6·1 answer
  • Freehan Company’s accounting records has the following information about its inventory:
    13·1 answer
  • Hall Co.’s allowance for credit losses had a credit balance of $24,000 at December 31, Year 1. During Year 2, Hall wrote off unc
    7·2 answers
  • An inmate escapes from the county prison. there is a $500 reward offered for any information leading to the capture of the inmat
    6·1 answer
  • Management accounting is accounting for effective management. Explain this statement.​
    11·1 answer
  • Wesley, who is single, listed his personal residence with a real estate agent on March 3, 2013, at a price of $390,000. He rejec
    13·1 answer
  • James is the new manager of operations at Springfield Motors. To his dismay, he finds the employees coming in late to work, taki
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!