Answer:
a) They had war horses that could run faster and would enable the Spaniards to kill without fighting hand-to-hand;
b) They had guns; the Native Americans had only axes and arrows
c) They had protective armor; the Native Americans had nothing
Explanation: All of these are solutions
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the implications of this study would be the way that , how questions are phrased can drastically influence the kind of answers that individuals provide. Therefore people with authority such as police officers and attorneys must be careful with how they phrase certain questions in order to avoid suggestibility bias.
In the film, How Cultures are Studied, Napoleon Chagnon believes myths are important to study because they embody a people's worldview.
<h3>Who was
Napoleon Chagnon?</h3>
Napoleon Chagnon passed away on September 21 in Traverse City, Michigan. He was a cultural anthropologist whose research on the Yanomami people of the Amazon rain forest made them well-known, but whose techniques sparked bitter arguments among other anthropologists.
Chagnon established field techniques for systematic data gathering and mathematical data analysis through repeated journeys to the Amazon. These techniques were published in the 1974 book Studying the Yanomamö (11), which concentrates on the single, sizable community of Mishimishimaböwei-Teri.
To know more about Napoleon Chagnon refer to: brainly.com/question/6121775
#SPJ4
Answer: What is true about the woodlands is that it has plenty of food.
Explanation:
Answer:Explained
Explanation:
Martina's strategy is wrong because there is no controlled conditions.
Any hypothesis which addresses the problem is done under controlled conditions in which only one or two factors are changed while others remains constant.
In Martina's strategy there is no restriction on five participants and they are allowed to do learn by their own technique.
