Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Answer:
i think this should help Florida is now the fourth largest state in the nation, with more than 14 million people in 1995. ... One result of rapid growth is a relatively high density of population.
Explanation:
The correct answer here would be D.
The Kellogg-Briand Pact in an international agreement signed by 64 nations which through it renounced war and agreed not to use it to solve disputes. The disputes were to be settled peacefully. It was signed in 1928 and had little effect, mainly because the League of Nations was enable to enforce it due to lack of authority and the absence of US. So the correct answer is D.
Answer:
hired more generals your welcome
<span>The answer is, because he is exhibiting </span>"<span>Substance dependence".
Substance dependence refers to a versatile express that creates from rehashed tranquilize organization, and which brings about endless supply of medication use. A medication addiction, an unmistakable idea from substance reliance, is characterized as impulsive, crazy medication use, notwithstanding negative results.
</span>
