Answer:
Stephen F, Austin was a well respected citizen among Texans. His success as an empressario gave him great credibility and his political policies were generally well received. Austin also had a great deal of experience and success negotiating relations between Anglo settlers and the Mexican government. The Texas delegates probably felt Austin’s relationship with Mexico would offer the greatest chance for success. They may have anticipated resistance, but probably did not expect Austin to be arrested.
Explanation:
that is the possible answer on edge
Answer: All of the above.
Explanation:
All of these were part of the agreement, and Hitler broke all of them.
Answer:
Greece
Explanation:
This is because if you look at the world map, Greece is the closest!
Your answer is false
hope it helps
Answer:
The partition of the Ottoman Empire (Armistice of Mudros, 30 October 1918 – Abolition of the Ottoman Sultanate, 1 November 1922) was a political event that occurred after World War I and the occupation of Constantinople by British, French and Italian troops in November 1918. The partitioning was planned in several agreements made by the Allied Powers early in the course of World War I,[1] notably the Sykes-Picot Agreement. As world war loomed, the Ottoman Empire sought protection but was rejected by Britain, France, and Russia, and finally formed the Ottoman–German Alliance.[2] The huge conglomeration of territories and peoples that formerly comprised the Ottoman Empire was divided into several new states.[3] The Ottoman Empire had been the leading Islamic state in geopolitical, cultural and ideological terms. The partitioning of the Ottoman Empire after the war led to the rise in the Middle East of Western powers such as Britain and France and brought the creation of the modern Arab world and the Republic of Turkey. Resistance to the influence of these powers came from the Turkish national movement but did not become widespread in the post-Ottoman states until after World War II.
Explanation:
