American Baptist minister and activist who became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the civil rights movement from 1954 until his death in 1968.
He's best known for advancing civil rights through nonviolence and civil disobedience, tactics his Christian beliefs and the nonviolent activism of Mahatma Gandhi helped inspire.
He also helped organize the 1963 March on Washington, where he delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech!!
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Dr. Kim would most likely argue that <span> Most therapists who diagnose the disorder use hypnosis and other memory retrieval methods that rely on suggestion.
Both hypnosis and other memory retrieval methods usually very reliable as a tool for the therapists to access the information that lie dormant in the patinet's subconscious.</span><span />
Answer:
D. Judicial Activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
It is the opposite of Judicial Restraint, as a judicial philosophy theory, which limits the power of judges to act only as per existing legal provisions under constitution.
