1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ikadub [295]
4 years ago
15

if you didnt have a potractor,how could you reconstruct the quarter or it from 0 degrees to 90degrees

Mathematics
1 answer:
sergiy2304 [10]4 years ago
4 0
43. Without having a protractor, how can we construct the quarter or it from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. This question is very simple. There are a lot of ways of how constructing a right angle without using a protractor. One of the easiest way is creating a straight vertical line then connect another horizontal from from vertical’s end on the bottom to the right or left. By that you can have a right angle or 90 degrees.
You might be interested in
Explain the purpose of statements and reasons in a formal proof.
baherus [9]

Geometric proofs can be written in one of two ways: two columns, or a paragraph. A paragraph proof is only a two-column proof written in sentences. However, since it is easier to leave steps out when writing a paragraph proof, we'll learn the two-column method.

A two-column geometric proof consists of a list of statements, and the reasons that we know those statements are true. The statements are listed in a column on the left, and the reasons for which the statements can be made are listed in the right column. Every step of the proof (that is, every conclusion that is made) is a row in the two-column proof.

Writing a proof consists of a few different steps.

Draw the figure that illustrates what is to be proved. The figure may already be drawn for you, or you may have to draw it yourself.

List the given statements, and then list the conclusion to be proved. Now you have a beginning and an end to the proof.

Mark the figure according to what you can deduce about it from the information given. This is the step of the proof in which you actually find out how the proof is to be made, and whether or not you are able to prove what is asked. Congruent sides, angles, etc. should all be marked so that you can see for yourself what must be written in the proof to convince the reader that you are right in your conclusion.

Write the steps down carefully, without skipping even the simplest one. Some of the first steps are often the given statements (but not always), and the last step is the conclusion that you set out to prove. A sample proof looks like this:

Given:

Segment AD bisects segment BC.

Segment BC bisects segment AD.

Prove:

Triangles ABM and DCM are congruent.

Notice that when the SAS postulate was used, the numbers in parentheses correspond to the numbers of the statements in which each side and angle was shown to be congruent. Anytime it is helpful to refer to certain parts of a proof, you can include the numbers of the appropriate statements in parentheses after the reason.

3 0
3 years ago
There is a puddle 1.4 cm deep in your backyard. After one minute of rain, the puddle was 1.45 cm deep. The puddle was 1.5 cm dee
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

I know answer. give me money I will tell everything..

3 0
3 years ago
A bag contains purple marbles and yellow marbles, 52 in total. The number of purple marbles is 4 more than 3 times the number of
Masja [62]

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

This question can be modeled using the equation 3x+4=52 (x is the purple marbles). To solve this equation subtract 4 from both sides, making it 3x=48. divide both by three showing x=16. This shows that 16 is the answer.

5 0
3 years ago
Xoxoxoxozooxoxoxoxoo
densk [106]
Ummm what? I don’t get it
7 0
3 years ago
For the equations given below, which statement is true?
seraphim [82]

Answer:

D. The equations do not have the same solution because the second eqlition can never be obtained when multiplying the first

equation by any value

Step-by-step explanation:

-21=14 Equ(1)

6.1=-42 Equ(2)

Multiplying the first equation by -3 will give

-63= -42

Which is not equivalent to the second equation

Multiplying the first equation by 3, we have

-63=42

Not equivalent to the second equation

Multiplying both sides of the first equation by -4, we have

84=56

Not equivalent to the second equation

D. The equations do not have the same solution because the second eqlition can never be obtained when multiplying the first

equation by any value

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 7x=5y , find the slope and the y-intercept of each line whose equation is given.
    11·2 answers
  • Simplify the expression.<br><br> 8.8 + 3.2y − 0.5(16y − 3)
    6·1 answer
  • Find the values of x and y. Leave answers in simplest radical form.<br>​
    15·1 answer
  • An iguana at a pet store is 5 feet long Measurement for iguana cages are given in inches How many inches long is the iguana?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the surface area of that
    15·1 answer
  • First answer gets brainliest
    9·2 answers
  • In ΔOPQ, the measure of ∠Q=90°, the measure of ∠O=29°, and QO = 26 feet. Find the length of PQ to the nearest tenth of a foot.​
    8·1 answer
  • More help, this is for a test and i can not fail
    14·2 answers
  • Write the linear equation in slope-intercept form given the following:
    6·1 answer
  • HELP QUICK PLS Which property is used in the following expression? (4 + 8) + 6 = 4 + (8 + 6) Associatve Property Commutitive Pro
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!