Answer:
lol
Step-by-step explanation:
nothiing
Answer: x=1/2
she was wrong, it's supposed to be
Step-by-step explanation: 8(x−3)+7=2x(4−17)
Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.
8(x−3)+7=2x(4−17)
(8)(x)+(8)(−3)+7=2x(4−17)(Distribute)
8x+−24+7=−26x
(8x)+(−24+7)=−26x(Combine Like Terms)
8x+−17=−26x
8x−17=−26x
Step 2: Add 26x to both sides.
8x−17+26x=−26x+26x
34x−17=0
Step 3: Add 17 to both sides.
34x−17+17=0+17
34x=17
Step 4: Divide both sides by 34.
34x/34=17/34 x=1/2
Red to yellow.......7:3....added = 10
so 7/10 of the total students wore red and 3/10 of the total students wore yellow
and there are 300 total students...
7/10(300) = 2100/10 = 210 wore red
3/10(300) = 900/10 = 90 wore yellow
how many more wore red.....(210 - 90) = 120 more students wore red then yellow
Answer:
37
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :
Sample size, n = 128
Mean, μ = 18
Standard deviation, σ = 5.4
Number of people who lost atleast 15 pounds :
The Zscore = (x - μ) / (σ)
Zscore = (15 - 18) / 5.4
Zscore = - 3 / 5.4
Zscore = - 0.5555
P(Z < - 0.555) = 0.28945
Number of people who lost atleast 15 pounds :
0.28945 * 128 = 37.0496
= 37 people
So here are the rules of horizontal asymptotes:
- Degree of Numerator > Degree of Denominator: No horizontal asymptote
- Degree of Numerator = Degree of Denominator:
- Degree of Numerator < Degree of Denominator: y = 0
Looking at the rational function, since the degree of the numerator is 2 and the degree of the denominator is 1 (and 2 > 1), this means that <u>this function has no horizontal asymptote.</u>
